Skip to content

ExpatSingapore

Home Message Board Contact Us Search

ExpatSingapore Message Board 25 May 2012, 7:50:00 am *
Username: Password: (or Register)
 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: 1984 Ha Ha Ha - Rogues State  (Read 1670 times)
antoine
Full Member
***
Posts: 139


View Profile
« on: 13 August 2003, 21:36:00 pm »

   

On the record
By IGNACIO RAMONET

"Big Brother is watching you" George Orwell, 1984

IF YOU were thinking of taking your summer holidays in the United States this year you might like to know that, under an agreement between the European Commission and the US federal authorities, items of personal information will be communicated, without your consent, by the airline company with which you travel to the US Customs. Even before you board the plane the US authorities will already know your surname, first name, age, address, passport number, credit card number, state of health, food preferences (which could indicate your religion) and your previous travels.

All this information will be fed into a data- processing system known as CAPPS (computer-assisted passenger pre-screening system) to help identify suspect people. By checking the identity of every traveller and cross-checking it with information available from the police, the State Department, the Department of Justice and the banks, CAPPS will evaluate the degree of danger passengers pose and will colour-code them accordingly: green for harmless, yellow for doubtful and red for those to be prevented from boarding. If the visitor is Muslim, or from the Middle East, a yellow code will be assigned automatically. The Border Security programme authorises customs officers to photograph the yellow-coded and take their fingerprints.

Latin Americans are also being watched. We now know that 65 million Mexicans, 31 million Colombians and 18 million citizens of Central America have files on them in the US, without their knowledge. Each file has their date and place of birth, gender, names of their parents, a physical description, their marriage status, the number of their passport and their stated profession. Often the files include confidential information such as personal addresses, phone numbers, bank account details, car registration numbers and fingerprints. It seems that the entire population of Latin America is gradually being put on file by Washington.

James Lee, spokesman for ChoicePoint, the company that buys these files to re-sell them to the US government, explained the process: "Our whole purpose in life is to sell data to make the world a safer place.What risks do people coming into our country represent?" (1). It should be noted that in the US it is against the law to stockpile personal data. But there is no law preventing a private company from collecting data on behalf of the US government. ChoicePoint, with its headquarters near Atlanta, Georgia, is a familiar name from the recent past. In Florida, during the US presidential elections in 2000, its subsidiary Database Technologies was hired by the state to reorganise its electoral lists. The result was that thousands of Floridians were deprived of their right to vote, which then affected the result of the election: it was won by George Bush by a mere 537 votes, a victory that put him into the White House (2).

Foreigners are not the only people subjected to increased surveillance. Americans themselves are suffering from the current paranoia. New controls, authorised by the USA Patriot Act, are threatening personal privacy and secrecy of correspondence. Authorisation is no longer required for telephone tapping. Inquiring authorities can now access personal information without needing a search warrant. For example, the FBI is currently asking libraries to provide them with lists of the books and internet sites consulted by their members as a way of building "intellectual profiles" of individual readers (3).

The scariest of all the projects of illegal state surveillance is the one being created by the Pentagon under the codename Total Information Awareness (4), a system for total data surveillance that has been entrusted to the care of Admiral John Poindexter, a man who was sentenced in the 1980s for having been the instigator of the Iran-Contra affair.

The project proposes collecting an average 40 pages of information on each of the 6 billion inhabitants of this planet and entering them into a supercomputer. By processing all available personal data - credit card payments, media subscriptions, banking activities, phone calls, website visits, email, police files, insurance details, medical and social security information - the Pentagon is hoping to establish a tracker profile of every adult alive.

As in Steven Spielberg's film Minority Report, the US authorities imagine that this will enable them to prevent crimes before they are committed. John Petersen, president of the Arlington Institute [which calls itself a "future-oriented research institute"], claims that there will be less privacy but more security. "We will be able to anticipate the future, thanks to the interconnection of all information to do with you. Tomorrow we shall know everything about you" (5).

One step on from Big Brother.

Ha Ha Ha...

Logged
ExpatSingapore Message Board
« on: 13 August 2003, 21:36:00 pm »



 Logged
Dolemite
Full Member
***
Posts: 222


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: 14 August 2003, 10:28:00 am »

Like a crackhead to the pipe, the Ant-man can't seem to stray from his subject of choice. Love the pic, though. Is that a Floyd cover? I believe it's the Japan only reissue of "Piper at The Gates of Dawn"?
Logged
Fresh Mint
Full Member
***
Posts: 203


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 14 August 2003, 17:41:00 pm »

No, its his latest Catscan.

(Out of curiosity, Antoine -- and this is a serious question --  which part of the sub-continent are you from?)

[This message has been edited by Fresh Mint (edited 14-08-2003).]

Logged
Dr Opinion
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1418


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: 20 August 2003, 23:00:00 pm »

When it gets so bad that our vociferous token American can offer nothing less than personal attacks when confronted with the fact of his shrinking liberty, I guess it's time to admit that the American Republic really has past it's peak.  
Logged
Dolemite
Full Member
***
Posts: 222


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: 21 August 2003, 9:24:00 am »

Vociferous? Token?
And in regards to my "shrinking" civil liberties, I fail to see the shrinkage. We live in an age of limitless collection of data. So the airline knows my food preferences? Is this supposed to frighten me? Maybe you've heard of the credit agencies in the US that seem to know every electric bill I ever paid late? Is this somehow"infringing" on my liberties?
We've been confronted with hysterical liberal rantings about John Ashcroft "Shredding" the Constitution since the day he stepped on board. I have yet to experience any decrease in my liberties at all (with the exception of getting a gun...still terribly difficult. But "those"  liberties don't count I suppose). Could you point me to the line in the constitution that grants me this right to anonymity that you seem to have found? Somehow didn't make my copy...  
As for "personal attacks" on our resident token hysteric lunatic: Cry me a river, build me a bridge, and get over it. You love to play devils advocate, Dr. O, and it's wonderfully charming. Responding to paranoid leftist nonsense with anything other than humor is the only way of expressing my lack of respect for the poster or the message without getting really nasty.
Logged
T2K
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1130


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: 21 August 2003, 12:06:00 pm »

I also see no shrinking liberty in the US.  
Law enforcement details don't matter, cops everywhere always have a way to get you if they want.  And lawyers have their tricks to counter them.

Checks and balances as intended in the Constitution are still solidly in place.

For instance, it took me all of 20 minutes to buy a new 9mm pistol last time I was home...

Logged
CK
Full Member
***
Posts: 153


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: 21 August 2003, 16:05:00 pm »

antoine I have nothing to hide. Do you?
Logged

Dr Opinion
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1418


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: 21 August 2003, 18:12:00 pm »

> "... buy a new 9mm pistol..."

9mm? What sort of a wuss buys a 9? 9s are for girls. Real men use .357 sig or at *least* 10mm (if they've got weak wrists, y'know).  

Logged
rolling ball
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 350


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: 21 August 2003, 22:23:00 pm »

"I also see no shrinking liberty in the US."

Just curious here, so whatever happened to the people of mideastern descent who got detained few months after 911. I read in the news in the US that they were detained, never charged and even some of their lawyers didn't know where they were. Read in the article that some were being moved frequently.

Logged

If you want to hire someone you want him to have all these 3 qualities: Smart, Motivated and Ethical. If he lacks ethics, you really don't want him to be smart and motivated.
Dolemite
Full Member
***
Posts: 222


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: 22 August 2003, 10:04:00 am »

You "read" that, hunh? FYI, anyone who was picked up was picked up for legitimate immigration violations. This "held without reason or trial" stuff is all urban myth, or stuff from the Guardian.
Logged
Dr Opinion
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1418


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: 23 August 2003, 0:43:00 am »

Jesus Wept, Dolomite, you live on another planet or somthing?

Here's Amnesty International on this particular issue.

You sure aint demonstrating a clear understanding of the issues surrounding your shrinking liberty, boyo.  

Logged
Dolemite
Full Member
***
Posts: 222


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: 23 August 2003, 11:46:00 am »

Again, they weren't rounding up people arbitrarily. The article you posted stated that they were held for immgration violations. And a whopping 36 were held for longer than 50 days. Over exaggeration of a minor issue.
Logged
Fresh Mint
Full Member
***
Posts: 203


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: 23 August 2003, 12:33:00 pm »

Well it probably wasn’t that minor an issue for those detained.

That said, Dr O’s link is a bit misleading in that it relates to a report issued nearly 18 months ago. For an update – also from Amnesty – take a look at this:
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAMR510792003?open&of=ENG-USA

Its worth noting the statement refers specifically to the U.S. Justice Department’s own highly self-critical inquiry in the post-September 11 detentions. Note that Amnesty “broadly welcomed” the report and was consulted during its compilation.

In my book, it doesn’t get much more transparent than that. Can you imagine such open self-criticism by Afghanistan’s learned Taliban? By Saddam Hussein’s cronies?

I am not an American or a fan of the current U.S. administration, but as far as civil liberties go I know no other country on earth where citizens enjoy more freedom and where government is prepared to subject itself to such internal and external scrutiny.

Logged
Dr Opinion
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1418


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: 23 August 2003, 22:15:00 pm »

Yes, I agree... but it is kept that way by fierce critical debate, robust dialogue, and a staunch refusal to turn a blind eye.

Take note, Dolemite.  

Logged
rolling ball
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 350


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: 25 August 2003, 21:58:00 pm »

Isn't a violation is still a violation, even if others do it more often?
Shouldn't someone get a penalty for breaking the law, even if s/he did it less often than others?

By the way, to keep the thread intersting, here's an example of a US Citizen not getting his rights.

http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/09/06/ar911.prosecution/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/10/01/findlaw.analysis.hilden.padilla/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/11/padilla.appeal/index.html

Granted that he's a terrorist, but He's still a US Citizen. So what happened to his rights? Did he lose it when he became a terrorist?

Logged

If you want to hire someone you want him to have all these 3 qualities: Smart, Motivated and Ethical. If he lacks ethics, you really don't want him to be smart and motivated.
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines