women do it better?

[nosy]

There is so much violance in the world. So much killing, such strong need for power. So much stubborness and childish behaviour displayed by world leaders. So many killings, so many kids suffering as a result of wars...

As one of the board members Jackie said in one the earlier threads, if we had women in power, would we still have these problems? Maybe we would have other problems? Some worse, some better.

Should the guys just pack up and hand over to the girls to see if they can do a better job?

What sort of world would we be living in then?

[This message has been edited by nosy (edited 11-03-2002).]

[dolphin]

Be it man or woman take charge, it'll still be a crude world.  Human beings make it complicated and due to human nature, one becomes greedy to be easily contented.

[expat1]

We have had women leaders, Britain, Indonesia, Philippines, etc., and I didn't notice much difference.  

[JonnyCav]

Lest We Forget - t'was Madam Thatcher who brought us the Falklands War....

[Manc Man]

johnny cav

don't get me wrong, i wouldn't offer thatcher a hand if she was drowning but I don't remember her starting a fight, just finishing one.

[WWDJs]

i heard something like this before.
it said, "if women were in power, there would be peace, but a few major conflicts for 3-5 days each month"

*grinz*