I believe for the most part - people are short sighted - focused only on their own self interests - able to feel sorry for those shown in the media - and at the end of the day not that interested in much outside themselves.
Sometimes for the public good, action must be taken to address wrongs, change perceptions, regardless of what is popular. Classic case - see 20 years ago, drink driving was common - now it is a moral wrong as well as a crime - you get little sympathy - it is as it should be.
Asia's role in Asia - most Australian's probably dont give a toss so long as they have money coming in. Our international image is something newspapers can talk about so long as we have money every week. Ultimately though politicans cannot afford to simply follow what the public thinks it wants. John Howard is a master at knowing how to manipulate the public.
ie. Port Arthur - there was a sense of outrage in the community and a strong hatred of guns. So John took guns away - which I have no with qualms with. John saw opportunity and increased his own standing.
Pauline Hanson - he sat back and did nothing - let her talk herself into oblivion. It's just ironic that what she espoused and was attacked for is now government policy - strange that.
GST - bring in a tax that killed the unloseable election for the libs in 93.
Howard can mix with the best of them politically because he can justapose populist policy with an agenda he is set on.
But ultimately populist politics is a recipee for disaster.
(hey its monday and I've already forgotten how i started this
) I just think politicans must strive to implant a vision on the country - that holds to the sanctity of human life - to the pursuit of happiness. It must protect itself but should ultimately lead and mold public opinion - not be dictacted by it.
I dont like Howard because of the way he mixes this - but then I guess all politicans are the same. Some just dont have any morals