Skip to content

ExpatSingapore

Home Message Board Contact Us Search

ExpatSingapore Message Board 25 May 2012, 23:36:38 pm *
Username: Password: (or Register)
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: a little good news...  (Read 726 times)
George Bush

Posts: 18


View Profile
« on: 17 June 2004, 6:52:00 am »

Twenty six ex-U.S. diplomats urge Bush's ouster


- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Harry Dunphy

June 16, 2004  |  WASHINGTON (AP) --

A group of 26 retired U.S. diplomats and military officers said Wednesday that President Bush should be voted out of office in November for damaging U.S. national security interests and America's standing in the international community.

‘‘Today we see that structure crumbling under an administration blinded by ideology and a callous indifference to the world around it," said Phyllis Oakley, former assistant secretary of state for intelligence and research. ‘‘Never before have so many of us felt the need for a major change in the direction of our foreign policy."

Retired Gen. Merrill A. ‘‘Tony" McPeak, former Air Force chief of staff, said the Bush administration anticipated a rosy reception after a military victory in Iraq but ‘‘we were totally unprepared for the post-combat occupation. So we see here unfolding before us a total disaster."

Charles Freeman, former ambassador to Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf war, said the administration's handling of wider relations with the Islamic world was particularly damaging to U.S. interests in the long run.

The group, which calls itself Diplomats and Military Commanders for Change, did not explicitly endorse Democrat John Kerry for president in its statement. But one of its members said Sunday ‘‘it goes more or less without saying."

The Bush-Cheney campaign said at least 20 members of the group have been involved in partisan political activities in the past.

‘‘It is not surprising that John Kerry has the support of a group of people who share his belief that the threat of terror is exaggerated," Bush-Cheney spokesman Steve Schmidt said in a statement. ‘‘This is a group that shares John Kerry's pre-September 11th world view and supports John Kerry's failed ideas for treating terrorism as a matter mainly for law-enforcement and intelligence."

State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said people who leave the Foreign Service can say what they want.

‘‘This is a group of people who have taken a stand, made a statement. They are free to do so," he said. ‘‘I think this administration has a record that it is happy to stand on," he added.

Among the group are 20 ambassadors, appointed by presidents of both parties, other former State Department officials and military leaders whose careers span three decades.

Prominent members include retired Marine Gen. Joseph P. Hoar, commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East during the administration of Bush's father; retired Adm. William J. Crowe Jr., ambassador to Britain under President Bill Clinton and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President Ronald Reagan; and retired Adm. Stansfield Turner, former head of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Hoar is a prominent critic of the war in Iraq, and Crowe and Turner have endorsed Kerry.

Also included is Jack F. Matlock, who was appointed by Reagan as ambassador to the Soviet Union and retained the post under the first President Bush, and William C. Harrop, the first President Bush's ambassador to Israel and four African countries.

Normally, former diplomats and military commanders avoid making political statements, especially in an election year. But last month 53 former diplomats accused the Bush administration of undermining U.S. credibility in the Middle East by its strong support for Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

[This message has been edited by George Bush (edited 17-06-2004).]

Logged
ExpatSingapore Message Board
« on: 17 June 2004, 6:52:00 am »



 Logged
Joseph27
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1506



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: 17 June 2004, 9:22:00 am »

Now what these sad sorry diplomats are missing is a good dose of Bruno like optimism.

Yes I know the Governing council members keep getting murdered, I know someone blew up the oil facilities thereby debiliating Iraq's export dollars, I know people are dying everyday - including US soldiers but really we should all take the Bruno line.  Everythings fine and dandy if we believe it in our hearts like the good republicans we are

Logged

"truth is a group of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms; a sum of human relation which is poetically and rhetorically intensified, metamorphosed and adored so that after a long time it is then codified in the binding canon."
PhilM
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1096


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 17 June 2004, 10:54:00 am »

Bush & Co’s history of deceit seems to be biting him in the butt day by day, yet they don't seem to see it.

The commission investigating the 9/11 terrorist attacks has reported there is not a single shred of evidence Saddam or Iraq in any way shape or form assisted Al Qaeda in attacking the USA. It turns out the only time an official from Al Qaeda approached Iraq on cooperation back in 1994 they were turned down flat.

Yet just last Monday 15th June both Bush and Cheney made speeches in which they claimed again Saddam had supported Al Qaeda and this had represented an unacceptable threat to the US. Vice President Dick Cheney claimed that ousted Iraqi leader Saddam had "long-established ties" to al Qaeda. Bush, asked on Tuesday about Cheney's comments, cited the presence in Iraq of Islamist militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as "the best evidence of a connection to al Qaeda affiliates and al Qaeda." Now by Monday/Tuesday this pair of crooks must have been aware of what the 9/11 commission was going to report yet they just carried on mouthing their lies.

The commission stated, "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."  They went on to say "There is no convincing evidence that any government financially supported al Qaeda before 9/11 -- other than limited support provided by the Taliban after bin Laden first arrived in Afghanistan,"

There were no Weapons of Mass Destruction left in Iraq’s hands, there was no link between Iraq and Al Qaeda – Bush, Blair and Co’s complete argument for going to war against Iraq has proved to be at best fabricated from dubious intelligence at worst deliberate lies. Yet Bush and Blair carry on pretending they have won some great victory, what a pair of paper tigers.

Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines