There is no way we can verfiy that. So we will assume you are Kubes since hardly anyone support his views (especially his ridiculous assertion that the govt/developers colluded to raise prices, etc)
I did not assert such a thing. But since you raised this as a possibility can you please tell us all here exactly
when and why the Deferred Payment Scheme was introduced? Then please explain
when and why the Deferred Payment Scheme was removed? What effect did the DPS have and what happened when the DPS was removed?
If you cannot or will not answer these questions adequately, you will prove that I am right again. Are you up to the challenge? Or just another gutless real-estate agent who now drives taxis?
-------------------
The collusion I was referring to is between agents and developers, to withhold properties, and talking-up supply constraints when all the data said there was none (in 2007 the rental vacancy rate did not drop below 5.7%).
The DPS scheme was introduced to bolster when the market was extremely weak and was removed when the market became too bullish. DPS is iused as an intrument to control the property market. If the market does decline more than 20% and the mood becomes extremely bearish, DPS will likely be reintroduced.
Agents and developers cannot increase prices by talking up supply constraints. At the end of the day 99% of available properties are in hands of owners and if there is an oversupply of property and not enough people to rent them, prices will decline despite whatever collusion there might be between developers/agents. If they can effectively collude to raise prices, then they should also be able to effectively collude to prevent prices from falling. I am sure you do not believe they could prevcent prices from dropping in view of your predictions of a 20% and subsequent 40% decline.
I am trying to refrain from calling you names but I can't resist because you really are one big SILLY chap.