Skip to content

ExpatSingapore

Home Message Board Contact Us Search

ExpatSingapore Message Board 27 May 2012, 15:22:00 pm *
Username: Password: (or Register)
 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What would India's opening ceremony be like  (Read 2581 times)
porushh
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« on: 16 August 2008, 22:17:35 pm »

What would India's opening ceremony be like


On the 8th of August as the world watched the Beijing Olympics, there was a tear in my eye as I remembered how Nehru and India had helped China in its formative years in the 1950s, when the whole world was against Communist China even entering the United Nations but India was its strongest ally and supporter. And now the Olympics were being held in China, which was aspiring to be the strongest and most powerful nation in the world, even over and above the USA, in the Olympic arena.
 
Indian Prime Ministers have certainly aspired to hold the Olympics,
but they have been ignored. I started to imagine, if indeed the
Olympics were held in India, what would the opening ceremony be like?
 
While China has proudly displayed its inventions, such as gunpowder, the compass and paper and fireworks, what would India have shown? Inventions? Conquest of Countries? The power of Money?
 
No. The strength of India is in the soul. It would have shown
the knowledge of the soul, since self-knowledge is the highest
knowledge. It would have shown the conquest of the frivolous mind.
 
While China's first Emperor unified and ruled over China and
controlled it with an iron hand, putting down all rebellions
ruthlessly, he could not rule his own mind, and became paranoid
in the end. He feared assasinations from his own courtiers and
trusted no one. He wanted to live forever, so took arsenic as a
medicine in order to live longer, which took his own life in the end.
 
Contrast that history of China to Emperor Ashoka, the conqueror of
North India, who changed from being a merciless conqueror of kingdoms to a benevolent king, filled with fatherly love for his own subjects, teaching morality to his kingdom in edicts, and even  setting up the very first animal hospitals in history. The English historian and writer H.G. Wells once called Ashoka the greatest King in human history. He was that impressed.
 
This conquest of the mind, this change from cruelty to kindness,
this transformation of evil to Godliness, is what India would
have shown in the opening ceremony. And this is unique to India.
India would show the national epic of the Ramayana, how the
ancient King Rama sacrificed his kingdom for the sake of his
father's promise, and went smiling to the forest. India would
show the high ideal of brotherly love, where Prince Bharat
refused to be the King, and instead ruled in his brother's name.
India would show the priceless jewel of womanly chastity, where
the beautiful princess Sita refused to part with her husband Rama,
and followed her husband in exile to the forest.
 
As Swami Vivekananda had pointed out in the 19th century,
compare this high ideal of India to the West, where Helen of Troy
is idolized, "the face that launched a thousand ships", the woman
who left her Greek husband and ran away with the Prince of Troy,
thus launching the Trojan war. Contrast this Western
ideal with the high ideal of mother Sita in India.
 
India would have shown how the writer of the Ramayana was
a dacoit and killer, Valmiki, who transformed himself
from a ferocious killer of lives to a saintly sage,
the RISHI who composed the Holy verses of the Ramayana,
thus giving the promise that even the most evil can change
to the most saintly, showing that nothing is impossible
for the human mind. As the ancient verse in India says,
"The mind is the man - the cause of his bondage, or
the cause of his liberation".
 
India would have shown how all religions have always
been welcomed and tolerated in India, such as how the
Zoroastrians came to India in boats from Iran and were
granted sanctuary 1300 years ago, with full religious
freedom, when the rest of the world was savagely intolerant
of other cultures and other religions.
 
And also, India would have shown how the might of the
British Empire was opposed with love and non-violence
by an apostle of peace and brotherly love, Mahatma Gandhi,
whom the whole world still remembers and says:
 
"In this day and age, when the world is torn
apart with hatred, violence and terrorism, when the
world is going to the worst depths of human depravity,
we need a Gandhi once again".
 
This would be India's opening ceremony for the Olympics,
And no one in the world can ever beat or equal this opening
ceremony. The pomp and splendor of the previous ceremonies
have come and gone, and are soon forgotten, but no one can
forget the nobility of the soul, no one would ever forget
the conquest of the mind that would be shown in the
ceremony. No human being would not be touched by
such an opening ceremony held by India. And may that
day come soon.
Logged
ExpatSingapore Message Board
« on: 16 August 2008, 22:17:35 pm »



 Logged
finding agent
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: 17 August 2008, 10:55:10 am »

Without intending to trivialise the emotiveness in your wishing-post, pourushh, I am sure when that day comes around, we will see at least one more new Olympic event being introduced- i.e Levitation.

It should prove more interesting, than the currently much heralded- century sprint; altho' I am sure there will be cynics out there who would skepticise, alleging, that watching paint dry would be infinitely more interesting than watching grey-bearded old men in "Puma" endorsed loin-cloths, literally, flyin'  Grin . ( If the Yardies deserve to be put on the world map, for entitlement of their 15-minutes of fame, why deprive the rishis of that ? )

If India were to be given an influential voice in the IOC, there would be numerous variations of the, Levitation, "sport", not limited to Synchronised Levitation  Roll Eyes , I am quite sure, and India will be up there in the medal standings then, for starters. Subsequently my guess is that others blessed with lighter bones would catch up, given their unfair, but blessed, genetical advantage.

P.S: I would fervently support the Eight Miles High (levitation) event (if it were to be referred to as that ! ) That would certainly add a new dimension and meaning to the other infamous club (members referred by) of the same name  Lips sealed

« Last Edit: 17 August 2008, 13:03:52 pm by finding agent » Logged
TheWrathOfGrapes
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 724


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 17 August 2008, 13:01:04 pm »

First, India has to put some resources into preparation for the Games, and try to win some more medals. Not sure if there's any rule to allow a non-heavy weight (in terms of Olympic medals won) country to host the Olympics. Not sure also whether there is an unofficial minimum per capita GDP before a country or city can be considered. Not aware of any developing country hosting it. Tokyo, Seoul  and Beijing were at the taking off stage economically.

Guess I won't be around to see India hosting the games.

Celebrate with "Zero".
Logged
finding agent
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: 17 August 2008, 13:11:02 pm »

My poignant suggestion is that India ought to capitalise on designer- invented performance enhancing loincloths. Or the Indians better resort to importing already gifted Chinese rishis. If that happens the Indians, if they are gracious by nature, should not cry, foul  Wink.

If economics is the other main consideration for hosting the Olympics, me am quite sure that that is not far off the horizon.

I am more concerned about their medal tally for now and what they can do to improve on it.
« Last Edit: 17 August 2008, 23:49:03 pm by finding agent » Logged
Dr. Phil
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1233


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: 17 August 2008, 18:01:47 pm »

The design of the stadium would have to be innovative, with not too much kindness or Godliness since it could not possibly accommodate all Indians indiscriminantly; the caste system would require segregation.
Logged
porushh
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: 17 August 2008, 21:32:28 pm »

Guys. you can joke all you want, but the fact remains
that the spiritual teachings of India have inspired the
world. There are a lot of Chinese who are Buddhists
and they come to India on pilgrimages.

What I am trying to say is that the Olympics have become
one-upmanship, as to which country can have a bigger and
better Olympics. I am trying to say that there are some
countries in the world who simply wont participate in
this "keeping up with the Joneses".
Logged
porushh
Newbie
*
Posts: 8


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: 17 August 2008, 21:41:25 pm »

Dr. Phil, have you been to a modern Indian city, like
Mumbai or Delhi? There is no caste system in modern cities,
all travel together to work just like in the West.
Logged
finding agent
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: 17 August 2008, 22:46:20 pm »

I have immense respect for all cradles of civilisation, but sorry porushh, I am getting lost with your "keeping up with the joneses" remark.

Are you suggesting that India would be an ideal host for the Olympics but it prefers not to lift a finger, to earn its chip on the shoulder by, winning medals or not compete (due to it subscribing to "higher ideals" viz. its philosophical/spiritual inclinations),  albeit it aspires to be a host nation ?   Huh
Logged
TheWrathOfGrapes
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 724


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: 18 August 2008, 8:22:21 am »

I am trying to say that there are some
countries in the world who simply wont participate in
this "keeping up with the Joneses".

Good news, porushh. In that case, you should ask the Indian government or Indian Olympic Council to bid for the next Youth Olympic Games. That would be a fresh start and the idea of the YOG is NOT to spend an obscene amount of money and to use as much existing sports and infrastructure facilities as possible. Which is what Singapore will be doing.
Logged
working_mom
Full Member
***
Posts: 237


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: 21 August 2008, 10:52:42 am »

India should first consider spending more money on its sport persons and sport infrastructure (excluding cricketers/cricket stadiums) instead of spending millions in hosting such a mega event and I am glad that finally India is assured of 3 medals.

And to Dr.Phil
Quote
The design of the stadium would have to be innovative, with not too much kindness or Godliness since it could not possibly accommodate all Indians indiscriminantly; the caste system would require segregation.


 India has the most active affirmitive action for the downtrodden and with a religion as old as mankind itself (Hinduism) there are bound to be discrepancies and discrimination but we are the first to accept the fallacies in the way the religion is pracitsed and trying to put it right. We have not succeeded but at least we are trying...I cannot say the same for some of the New age religions that are being practiced.
« Last Edit: 26 August 2008, 6:40:10 am by BoardAdmin2 » Logged
Dr. Phil
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1233


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: 21 August 2008, 12:34:06 pm »

India should first consider spending more money on its sport persons and sport infrastructure (excluding cricketers/cricket stadiums) instead of spending millions in hosting such a mega event and I am glad that finally India is assured of 3 medals.

And to Dr.Phil
Quote
The design of the stadium would have to be innovative, with not too much kindness or Godliness since it could not possibly accommodate all Indians indiscriminantly; the caste system would require segregation.


 India has the most active affirmitive action for the downtrodden and with a religion as old as mankind itself (Hinduism) there are bound to be discrepancies and discrimination but we are the first to accept the fallacies in the way the religion is pracitsed and trying to put it right. We have not succeeded but at least we are trying...I cannot say the same for some of the New age religions that are being practiced.

"...the most affirmative action.......with a religion as old as mankind...."

Don't you see the contradiction in your words?
If your religion is so much older than other "younger" religions, you have had that much more time to get it right. The fact is you have not begun.  Huh

 
« Last Edit: 26 August 2008, 6:40:39 am by BoardAdmin2 » Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines