Just curious what is the general thinking out there.
A friend is intending to get a 99 yrs cluster house in the east. The town house has been around for 10 yrs plus physically. But the lease could have started earlier.
They are gg to pay close to 1MM for it and just wondering if it is a safe bet even though they are keeping it for their own stay. I do see landed houses value going down particularly if they are 99 yrs lease.
We are firm believer of FH or 999 yrs.
Your friend will see their $1 million erode away should ppty prices fall sharply. From what i have noticed so far - among the leaseholds, townhouses have the lowest resale value - better to get an apt. Reason being that the younger ones may like it but will prefer something more practical as they age (weak knees make climbing up the steep staircases a real pain). Rental market is also not favourable as most westerners prefer the traditional bungalows, semi-ds and detaches.
even 99-year landed homes are a no-no. During the last peak, someone we knew bought a corner terrace in kew crescent area for close to $2 million. Huge house, with 5 bedrooms but value fell to a low of only $1.1 million. Current value around $1.5 million.