sure is diverse:
"In 2006, the largest ancestry groups in the Perth metropolitan areas were: English (534,555 or 28.6 per cent), "Australian" (479,174 or 25.6 per cent), Irish (115,384 or 6.2 per cent), Scottish (113,846 or 6.1 per cent), Italian (84,331 or 4.5 per cent) and Chinese (53,390 or 2.9 per cent). There were 3,101 Aboriginals in the city (0.2 per cent).[26]"
Just think of all that cultural whiplash between the festivities of the English, Australians and Irish.
I think we'll just put this down as another example of Oz Rules/Singapore Bites Syndrome that has affected a certain poster.
That is interesting, but not relevant to this conversation. You remind me of my silly (female) HR people who are have set diversity goals for the levels here in Asia through the organization based on only gender. I have given up explaining to them that diversity encompasses: religion, age, race, gender, sexual persuasion, even able bodiness.
So in the context of this discussion the dimensions of diversity I referred to include: types of housing, physical size, regions within the cities, build quality, land values, income levels, economic and population growth/decline rates, taxes levels, ownership/rental ratios, etc.
I used SG as a common benchmark since the OP did not indicate where he is from (though he hinted the Yorkshire moors).
Use you brain next time before carrying on like an idiot. Are you in HR?