To Tropical Fish: why not take it up with Administration?
When I was in school I don't recall the school asking parents what they thought kids should be learning or what they needed in order to do so. The school just informed parents and students. They know what is required to teach and learn their curriculum. Why ask non-educators about education - should they teach evolution because a few parents believe it correct despite the lack of scientific evidence?
It seems to me that most students (again, at least at UWC) already have laptops. It has become as essential to students as iPods and mobile phones. Students have particular tools for school - books, calculators, pens, and now a laptop. What is unusual about that? This requirement is spreading around the world and you would deny your child this opportunity? Maybe you don't want your child using the internet but, if so, you're not doing them any favors.
Instead of a knee-jerk reaction to oppose it, why not find out the function of the laptop. I recall being required to buy a scientific calculator. Would my parents get upset at that? Of course, not. It was an essential tool of education. I suspect the same is now true of laptops.
Also, you can obtain insurance for theft or damage if you're worried about that.
I doubt your statement that so many parents are opposed. Maybe you're just opinionated and they don't want to argue with you. If SAS is like other western schools, parents want their children to receive the best education possible and if a laptop is required then so be it.
Basically, though, you're just complaining without any evidence to support you, without any apparent conversation with the school, and then go on to suggest lots of bad decisions again without any evidence.
Perhaps you could use a laptop to education yourself!