I thought I read last year that local schools were going to increase the amount that foreigners had to pay to attend, somewhere along the lines of about $5,000 per year - is that not correct?
Anyhow, I know (and have known) quite a few home schooled kids here, some who are no longer home schooled and are at university now (and doing very well both socially and academically) and a couple who were home schooled through primary and went to school when they were secondary age. One of the many advantages of home schooling that I've seen is that they have a much shorter day simply because they get their work done so much quicker - no changing classrooms, teachers spending lots of time with one kid and neglecting the others etc - they can do a whole school day's work in about 3 hours if they knuckle down.
But for some people they still have to pay for other classes and I've known parents put their kids in art, music or extra maths classes simply because they haven't got the training or facility to do it at home, so they do get to socialise through that kind of thing.
As a non believer in homeschooling I am curious as to why people who chose to teach their children at home would hire a teacher - surely this makes the whole home schooling ethos null and void?
not everyone who teaches their child at home is a teacher themselves and for some there can be certain aspects to the work that they're simply not qualified to teach, especially if they're still home schooling when the child is older.