|
Oh my
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: 30 August 2010, 17:12:14 pm » |
Quote
|
I also use Human, when providing my race. Never had it questioned.
Kubes. In your case this would be providing false information.A crime in this country.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ExpatSingapore Message Board
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: 30 August 2010, 17:12:14 pm » |
Quote
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
To: Oh my
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: 30 August 2010, 17:24:29 pm » |
Quote
|
YOU WIN hands down..!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
olympian
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: 30 August 2010, 17:40:10 pm » |
Quote
|
If you answer "Human" or "100 meters" to race, then do you answer "Yes Please", or "No Thank you" to the quetion about Sex?
I usually put "6 times a week". (I rest on the Sabbath)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CaucasianYeh
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: 02 September 2010, 22:34:09 pm » |
Quote
|
Caucasia is indeed the geographic area between Russia and Turkey. Georgia, Amernia, and Chechnya are all caucasian countries.
All a bit old school but 100 years ago, humans were classified into four races; Caucasoid (white), Negroid (black), Mongoloid (Asian and Polynesian), and Australoid (Australian Aborigines)
The use in Singapore no doubt comes from this old classification.
Oh, and in the early days of British rule, the race classification was more granular, Chinese were classified as Hokkien, Teochew, Cantonese etc, and Malays were classified as Malay, Bugis, Javanese etc
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
$Pripps
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: 02 September 2010, 23:04:19 pm » |
Quote
|
Caucasia is indeed the geographic area between Russia and Turkey. Georgia, Amernia, and Chechnya are all caucasian countries.
All a bit old school but 100 years ago, humans were classified into four races; Caucasoid (white), Negroid (black), Mongoloid (Asian and Polynesian), and Australoid (Australian Aborigines)
The use in Singapore no doubt comes from this old classification.
Oh, and in the early days of British rule, the race classification was more granular, Chinese were classified as Hokkien, Teochew, Cantonese etc, and Malays were classified as Malay, Bugis, Javanese etc
thanks for shedding some light on this matter, we really needed somebody who could quote us from wikipedia since we can't google ourselves.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Han tribes
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: 02 September 2010, 23:15:03 pm » |
Quote
|
Caucasia is indeed the geographic area between Russia and Turkey. Georgia, Amernia, and Chechnya are all caucasian countries.
All a bit old school but 100 years ago, humans were classified into four races; Caucasoid (white), Negroid (black), Mongoloid (Asian and Polynesian), and Australoid (Australian Aborigines)
The use in Singapore no doubt comes from this old classification.
Oh, and in the early days of British rule, the race classification was more granular, Chinese were classified as Hokkien, Teochew, Cantonese etc, and Malays were classified as Malay, Bugis, Javanese etc
Yo, Hokkien, Teochew, Cantonese, Hakka, Hainanese etc are not races lah. They are all Chinese dialects. The Chinese in Singapore are still classified along these lines and many Chinese Associations are run along these lines.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
colonial rule
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: 02 September 2010, 23:22:23 pm » |
Quote
|
Caucasia is indeed the geographic area between Russia and Turkey. Georgia, Amernia, and Chechnya are all caucasian countries.
All a bit old school but 100 years ago, humans were classified into four races; Caucasoid (white), Negroid (black), Mongoloid (Asian and Polynesian), and Australoid (Australian Aborigines)
The use in Singapore no doubt comes from this old classification.
Oh, and in the early days of British rule, the race classification was more granular, Chinese were classified as Hokkien, Teochew, Cantonese etc, and Malays were classified as Malay, Bugis, Javanese etc
This is how the British likes it - divide and rule, playing one group against the other.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Whoa
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: 03 September 2010, 3:24:11 am » |
Quote
|
It must be a PITA, traipsing around with that colossal chip on you shoulder, PP,
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Eh really?
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: 03 September 2010, 12:03:19 pm » |
Quote
|
Not more pain than stating any facts, matter of factly of course
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CaucasiaYo!
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: 03 September 2010, 14:49:56 pm » |
Quote
|
Caucasia is indeed the geographic area between Russia and Turkey. Georgia, Amernia, and Chechnya are all caucasian countries.
All a bit old school but 100 years ago, humans were classified into four races; Caucasoid (white), Negroid (black), Mongoloid (Asian and Polynesian), and Australoid (Australian Aborigines)
The use in Singapore no doubt comes from this old classification.
Oh, and in the early days of British rule, the race classification was more granular, Chinese were classified as Hokkien, Teochew, Cantonese etc, and Malays were classified as Malay, Bugis, Javanese etc
Yo, Hokkien, Teochew, Cantonese, Hakka, Hainanese etc are not races lah. They are all Chinese dialects. The Chinese in Singapore are still classified along these lines and many Chinese Associations are run along these lines. Its true these are dialect groups but in colonial days they were used as ethnic classifiers. In Chinatown you had different areas allocated to different dialect groups. Big change after independence was that "Chinese" were then considered as one group with one mother tongue Manadarin. All part of nation building.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Apache
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: 08 September 2010, 9:51:18 am » |
Quote
|
Probably a more useful classification would be :
1. Arrogant American 2. Racist Aussie 3. Pompous French 4. Tighta*** Swiss 5. Bumbling Brits
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
midnitecowboy
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: 08 September 2010, 18:52:59 pm » |
Quote
|
If you answer "Human" or "100 meters" to race, then do you answer "Yes Please", or "No Thank you" to the quetion about Sex?
I would have to honestly say, Twice a week!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|