Skip to content

ExpatSingapore

Home Message Board Contact Us Search

ExpatSingapore Message Board 28 May 2012, 3:11:05 am *
Username: Password: (or Register)
 
Pages: [1] 2
  Reply  |  Print  
Author Topic: Why do we have to pay TV tax  (Read 698 times)
musp

Posts: 105


View Profile
« on: 04 January 2003, 2:09:00 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

Now that most households receive TV content thru their paid cable provider, I can't seem to understand the validity of the annual TV license of $110.

Logged
ExpatSingapore Message Board
« on: 04 January 2003, 2:09:00 am »
Reply with quoteQuote



 Logged
weird
Guest
« Reply #1 on: 04 January 2003, 2:36:00 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

Yeah, weird!
I receive my salary tru my company and still have to pay income tax.
Logged
celestar
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 82


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 04 January 2003, 8:19:00 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

most? since when....

as SBA would keep reminding us - the tv licence is to fund shows in free for viewing channels ie. programmes for minority races or arts programme which are not commercially viable... oh well..

Logged
dont come a knockin'
Guest
« Reply #3 on: 04 January 2003, 21:18:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Huh??...TV license??...been here 3 years and never paid nor been asked for it.
Logged
Chiku_
Guest
« Reply #4 on: 04 January 2003, 22:58:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

dont come a knockin'

Maybe your landlord has been paying for it.  It's definitely required.
http://www.sba.gov.sg/sba/l_residentialtv.jsp#

Logged
unfair
Guest
« Reply #5 on: 06 January 2003, 9:02:00 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

Its unfair to pay for programmes that are so poor quality and useless. Why don't they just take the revenue out of the pay TV? At least you're paying that money for s/thing you actually WANT to watch. But why should I subsidise programs I really DISLIKE?
Logged
Fedup
Guest
« Reply #6 on: 08 January 2003, 18:25:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Another grouse against the Singapore government's policy? Purleaseeee stop comparing Singapore to your own country! For your information, Singapore has its own taxation laws and needless to say it AGAIN, if you don't like paying TV tax, then don't own a TV. You see, problem resolved! Duh!
Logged
Whinge
Guest
« Reply #7 on: 08 January 2003, 19:16:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote


But hang in there.  TV tax - although it sound unfavourable - just remember that income tax is like really LOW here in Singapore.  And the TV tax is super low - I'll spend that in one night in a Hawker centre for dinner!

Just go back home to Australia, for example and pay 48% tax!

Logged
unfair
Guest
« Reply #8 on: 08 January 2003, 19:51:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Its not the size of the tax. Its the fact that a consumer item is specifically taxed in order to fund programmes that have limited entertainment or educational value. Income tax is a broad based tax and can't be compared.
Logged
why unfair
Guest
« Reply #9 on: 08 January 2003, 20:06:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

so you have to pay a little bit of money to subsidise Arts programmes or limited appeal programmes for minority interests and minority races.
How DULL would TV be if it just catered for mass TV, then it would be endless game shows, soaps, Police Camera Crime Action.  TV can be a learning experience, think of it as a library, all the books there appeal to a wide selection of people and if we all pay our taxes we are all entitled to something in return.  At least it is not programmed just by Govt people, then think what we would get!
Logged
RadioHead
Guest
« Reply #10 on: 08 January 2003, 20:10:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Someone told me there is a tax on radio's too?  Can anyone confirm or deny?

If you have a household with say 3 tv's and 4 radio's do you need 7 licences?  Or ONE for all ??

Logged
TaxMan
Guest
« Reply #11 on: 08 January 2003, 20:16:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

The tax issue is a hot one.  SG may have relatively low income taxes but taxes you to death on everything else.  Like a meal out is +++ and excise on alcohol (which is crippling; OK it's a vice tax), anyone seen lately the direct/indirect taxes on buying a car?  Petrol???  Driving in town (tolls)??  TAX TAX AND MORE TAX.  This place is NOT cheap but mainly only if you consume.  Does anyone NOT consume.  Didn't GST just rise by 66%??  There are even cases of tax on tax (Even Australia can do that!).
Logged
Imagine
Guest
« Reply #12 on: 08 January 2003, 21:51:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Taxman.

In my book when GST goes from 3% to 4% the raise is 33.3% only.

Logged
TAXidermist
Guest
« Reply #13 on: 08 January 2003, 22:11:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

and 4% is so little compared to the VAT/ GST in other places.. even lower than M'sia.

cars: do you really need them here?

alcohol and cigarette taxes: hurray for teetotallers and non-smokers.... instead of banning SALE of chewing gums - they should just impose VERY HIGH taxes too ...

RADIOHEAD: the TV/radio licence covers all regardless the number of appliances you have....

if one wants to stinge on that $100 plus a year, i suggest you listen to live radio broadcast over the net, and download tv shows for free and watch on your PC ....


Logged
Imagine
Guest
« Reply #14 on: 08 January 2003, 22:22:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

The need for TV tax can be explained as follows.

A TV is a consumer product, for which we expect the government to build up the infrastructure.
(We also expect the Government to build roads so we can drive our cars)

Without a cable structure underground as well as broadcasting dishes above ground, a transmission of data would not be possible.
It is the governments duty to provide this infrastructure, the same way as it provides electricity and telephone.

Usage of electricity can be measured and therefor be billed according to the "user pays" system. Same goes for telephony.

However, receipt of tv and radio broadcast cannot be measured and therefor the "equally pay" system is used.
The total costs for operating the broadcasting system is divided by the number of households that own a receiver.

Commercial tv stations do not have their own data network, and are users of the government network and as such they need to pay for usage.
The existance of commercial broadcasting companies should in basic be reason for a lower tv tax, however with a more intensive use of the system a more rapid expansion of the same system is needed.

Presently the data system in Singapore provides us with services as Internet, Broadband, Nets, ATM, SAM, TV, Radio, Telephony, Satellite etc etc

So, travellers pay airport tax, drivers pay road tax, receivers pay tv tax.
All can be put in the same category i.e. a tax system that is used for the common benefit of the whole society.

An option however would be to shift the tv tax into the income tax system.
The income tax supports common used services as police and civil defense.
Services that we might never use, but for which we still have to pay.

Logged
Pages: [1] 2
  Reply  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines