Skip to content

ExpatSingapore

Home Message Board Contact Us Search

ExpatSingapore Message Board 28 May 2012, 5:16:06 am *
Username: Password: (or Register)
 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Reply  |  Print  
Author Topic: Small Claims Court over rental deposit  (Read 2678 times)
Sell the LL's House
Guest
« Reply #15 on: 31 January 2012, 20:28:27 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

I presume that Singapore would have the same sort of legal process as other places in the world.

Apply to sell the LL's goods. If the warrant for sale is returned nil effects, then presuming that the LL still owns her house, apply to the court to sell her house to satisfy your order.

You'll soon get paid.
Logged
ExpatSingapore Message Board
« Reply #15 on: 31 January 2012, 20:28:27 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote



 Logged
push on
Guest
« Reply #16 on: 31 January 2012, 22:07:42 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

The bailiff's opinion is his opinion.
I would push the issue in court and claim legal costs in addition.

Obtain the Warrant for Sale en drag the fridge out of the house as a starter. Perhaps there is a washing machine as well. With a bit of luck the present tenant will consider that breach of contract and stop paying the rent to the owner.

Not obeying a court order in Singapore is a serious offence and the owner may be in serious trouble.

To speak with the words of the PP: You'll soon get paid.
Logged
AnotherOne
Guest
« Reply #17 on: 07 February 2012, 19:03:24 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Hi,
In a similar situation. We have provided a one month's notice to our LL and plan to vacate by 01-Mar-12. Lease runs till May-12.

Now the LL agent comes back with - "OK to vacate if a suitable replacement is found else the obligatory period is till May-12"

The tenancy agreement does not mention a 'Fixed' duration for the tenancy and does not mention what happens if the agreement is terminated before May-12. It just says that I will have to reimburse the agent's pro-rated commission.

Now if I go ahead and vacate the apartment, what options do I have and does the LL have a legal recourse to insist that I pay the full term?

Keen to get feedback. Thanks!

Logged
Read It Again
Guest
« Reply #18 on: 08 February 2012, 8:09:24 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

Are you sure? Read it again. Is your lease a short term one, or for 2 years?
Logged
AnotherOne
Guest
« Reply #19 on: 08 February 2012, 14:00:10 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

yep - Read it a couple of times. I signed up for a year this time around (been in the same apartment 5 yrs now).

On top of it the LL wants to 'review' the prospective tenants profile and evaluate suitability, what a load of s***!

I am thinking of vacating as planned and mailing the keys across!
Logged
chinotango
Newbie
*
Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: 14 February 2012, 20:15:19 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Well in the T.A.. on a one year lease.... is there a MINIMUM Occupational period/break lease clause? like example 6 month minim stay with a one month notice?

Its the agent's problem if he cant find a suitable tenant profile after you have given the one month notice..as that way not stated in the contract..
As long as you have done your due diligence in giving the one month notice, the landlord should have no right holding back your deposit or making you pay any extra.
Logged
UsAlly
Guest
« Reply #21 on: 15 February 2012, 19:27:06 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Usually, one year leases do not have break lease clauses and one must complete the tenancy or pay up.
Logged
AnotherOne
Guest
« Reply #22 on: 16 February 2012, 10:31:31 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

Thanks for the inputs folks - got a tenant to take over as soon as we leave so no issues around paying up for the full period. I wasn't planning to anyhow.

Lesson learnt: Go over the fine print for something as mundane as a rental agreement.

Thankfully, we move into our place from here so no more landlord or their agents!
Logged
Bear In Mind
Guest
« Reply #23 on: 17 February 2012, 0:46:42 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

A lot of landlords do not cooperate in instances like this and insist on being paid for the full term then go out and find their own tenant. Win-win for the landlord. He who baulks first wins.
Logged
Mr A
Guest
« Reply #24 on: 17 February 2012, 10:14:20 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

A lot of landlords do not cooperate in instances like this and insist on being paid for the full term then go out and find their own tenant. Win-win for the landlord. He who baulks first wins.

If the landlord insists on being paid the full term then he should not be handed back the keys until the term is completed. Let his apartment sit empty and then sue him if he tries to sub let while an enforced contract is still in place.
Logged
SoundsBrill
Guest
« Reply #25 on: 17 February 2012, 23:06:32 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Sounds brill, but it won't pan out like that. LL scoops the dosh and gets the keys while squealing weeeweewee all the way home. Unique, alright.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Reply  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines