Skip to content

ExpatSingapore

Home Message Board Contact Us Search

ExpatSingapore Message Board 28 May 2012, 10:02:20 am *
Username: Password: (or Register)
 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Reply  |  Print  
Author Topic: 'Britishness' Test for Immigrants  (Read 2829 times)
Deadpoet

Posts: 94


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: 18 September 2003, 8:51:00 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

I wonder if Kim Philby would pass the "Russian-ness" test.
Logged

Deadpoet
Carpe Diem
ExpatSingapore Message Board
« Reply #30 on: 18 September 2003, 8:51:00 am »
Reply with quoteQuote



 Logged
Guy Burgess
Guest
« Reply #31 on: 18 September 2003, 11:08:00 am »
Reply with quoteQuote

Niet, but he'd certainly pass the "Pillock Test"
Logged
bigots
Guest
« Reply #32 on: 26 October 2003, 22:35:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

Bigots in blue


POLICE chiefs must read the riot act to their boys in blue following this week’s BBC documentary exposing racism.

The Secret Policeman proved that bigots are poisoning the force and it comes as no surprise that just three per cent of our officers come from ethnic backgrounds.

The behaviour of eight bobbies — captured outstandingly by undercover reporter Mark Daly — was repulsive.

In particular, vile Rob Pulling who wore a Ku Klux Klan-style white hood and giggled after every racist comment he made — as if he thought it cool.

Ten years after the death of Stephen Lawrence and the report which branded the Met institutionally racist, the police force is still perceived that way and its overlords must stamp out that notion.

Shockingly, eight out of just 18 recruits in Daly’s group at the Bruche training centre in Cheshire were proved prejudiced. That figure would undoubtedly be repeated in such centres — and police stations — across the country.

That’s more than just a few bad apples. As Pulling said disturbingly: “Everyone’s like it, mate.”

Sorry, but the truth is it will be hard to look at an officer in the same way again.

The programme left me angry, embarrassed and astonished as in one hour the very fabric of a force which we are brought up to respect, trust and admire was blown apart. Trainers say racism will not be tolerated and the use of certain words — which I have chosen not to repeat — will result in dismissal.

Yet one officer was fined just 13 days’ wages after a complaint that he used one of the abhorrent terms. That sends a dangerous message to trainee cops.

Like-minded officers must not be allowed to patrol our multi-cultural streets. The entire police system has to be overhauled. Training must root out bigots early on and they should be prosecuted for inciting racial hatred — as I hope the eight in this film will be.

Just as the police encourage members of the public to grass up criminals, so they themselves should be urged to help expose their own narrow-minded colleagues. The force must employ Daly’s tactic and monitor recruits covertly to ensure the next generation of officers is tolerant of ethnic minorities.

Any doubt and they should be booted out and taken to court.

Pulling boasted about beating up an Asian man himself. Why wasn’t that investigated properly at the time?

Perhaps his victim was sceptical of how his complaint would be handled.

But do feel for the thousands of decent, honest and committed police officers who must sense their integrity has been tainted by scum like Pulling.

Indeed, they must now work even harder to convince a doubtful public that they are in fact genuine, especially when dealing with criminals or victims from ethnic groups.

The irony here is that the only person featured in the programme to be arrested was Daly himself for committing three offences: Obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception (his police wages), presenting false documents (not revealing he had worked as an undercover reporter), and, laughably, damaging police property (he punctured a bullet-proof vest to hold a tiny camera).

What he has done is to pierce a hole through the heart of British policing.

David Blunkett must step in and see all charges against Daly are dropped — and insist he’s awarded a BAFTA.

Logged
thereyougo
Guest
« Reply #33 on: 26 October 2003, 22:42:00 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

shows that you don't have to take the test to be an immigrant in the UK.


60,000 illegals can stay

By GEORGE PASCOE-WATSON
Deputy Political Editor

FURY erupted last night as 60,000 failed asylum seekers were told they could stay in the UK indefinitely.

Home Secretary David Blunkett granted Britain’s biggest ever asylum amnesty — saying it would cost too much to kick out the refugees.

The amnesty is the SECOND of Tony Blair’s premiership. And Labour were immediately rapped for waving the white flag on asylum.

The new amnesty applies to 15,000 families, mostly from Kosovo and the former Yugoslavia. The precise number of people involved is not known, but is estimated at 60,000.

Most applied for asylum after arriving in the late 90s. But they were refused and have been caught up in a complex appeals system ever since.

Mr Blunkett said allowing them to stay and get jobs would save £180million, because most are currently on benefits.

But Sir Andrew Green of Migrationwatch UK said: “The message to asylum seekers is clear.

“Remain here illegally for long enough and we’ll let you stay. This is not ‘clearing the decks’ it is more like abandoning the ship.”

The asylum cave-in comes despite repeated calls from The Sun for a crackdown on illegal immigration.

Mr Blunkett chose to announce the amnesty on a day when the Commons was not sitting — and Concorde was taking its final flight.

It applies to families who put in for asylum before 2000, when the system was tightened up to allow just one appeal.

Mr Blunkett described the move as a “one-off exercise”. But it is only four years since Labour’s last amnesty, when Jack Straw granted 40,000 people the right to stay.

Mr Blunkett insisted: “Letting them remain is the most cost-effective way of dealing with the situation.”

He also admitted it would now be “difficult” to deport the refugees, who had been here for “donkey’s years”.


Shadow Home Secretary Oliver Letwin said the amnesty would strengthen Britain’s reputation as a magnet for asylum seekers.

He said: “They know that even if their cases are rejected they could be allowed to stay. People will be appalled at this abject failure to sort out asylum.”

A staggering 103,000 asylum seekers flooded into Britain last year. Nearly 70,000 were rejected. But just 10,000 were forcibly removed.

A TOP judge slammed Mr Blunkett yesterday for creating an avalanche of asylum-related court cases.
Justice Maurice Kay said Government attempts to cut the number of cases had failed, leading to a backlog of 800 lawsuits, with 60 being added each week.

He said the crisis was costing a “vast amount” of money. The Home Office blamed asylum lawyers for launching unnecessary cases.



Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Reply  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines