Skip to content

ExpatSingapore

Home Message Board Contact Us Search

ExpatSingapore Message Board 26 May 2017, 17:17:58 PM *
Username: Password: (or Register)
 
Pages: 1 ... 134 135 [136]
  Print  
Author Topic: Science Disproves Evolution  (Read 378633 times)
oldmike
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 980


View Profile
« Reply #2025 on: 12 May 2017, 22:51:07 PM »

to refresh your memory:
Quote
for God may have created an array of radioisotopes which, if analyzed with false assumptions, could be misinterpreted as age. 


Logged


Pahu
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1123



View Profile
« Reply #2026 on: 17 May 2017, 22:32:10 PM »

Fossil Gaps 1


If evolution happened, the fossil record should show continuous and gradual changes from the bottom to the top layers. Actually, many gaps or discontinuities appear throughout the fossil record (a).

a. “But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them imbedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?” Darwin, The Origin of Species, p. 163.

“...the number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed [must] truly be enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory [of evolution].”  Ibid., p. 323.

Darwin then explained that he thought that these gaps existed because of the “imperfection of the geologic record.” Early Darwinians expected the gaps would be filled as fossil exploration continued. Most paleontologists now agree that this expectation has not been fulfilled.

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]
Logged

Truth Frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.
oldmike
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 980


View Profile
« Reply #2027 on: 18 May 2017, 2:14:39 AM »

Once again, when God planted false evidence to mislead scientists into believing that the earth was ancient, He slipped up by providing an incomplete fossil record.
Do you believe in an incompetent god?
Logged
Pahu
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1123



View Profile
« Reply #2028 on: 18 May 2017, 2:32:45 AM »

Once again, when God planted false evidence to mislead scientists into believing that the earth was ancient, He slipped up by providing an incomplete fossil record.
Do you believe in an incompetent god?

Nonsense!
Logged

Truth Frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.
oldmike
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 980


View Profile
« Reply #2029 on: 18 May 2017, 13:52:35 PM »

I am merely quoting your own post, Viz.
Quote
for God may have created an array of radioisotopes which, if analyzed with false assumptions, could be misinterpreted as age. 
If He planted radioisotopes to confuse scientists, fossils would have been planted for the same reason.
Logged
Pahu
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1123



View Profile
« Reply #2030 on: 25 May 2017, 3:37:36 AM »

Fossil Gaps 2


The Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago has one of the largest collections of fossils in the world. Consequently, its former dean, Dr. David Raup, was highly qualified to discuss the absence of transitions in the fossil record:

“Well, we are now about 120 years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn’t changed much. The record of evolution is still surprisingly jerky and, ironically, we have even fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin’s time. By this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as a result of more detailed information—what appeared to be a nice simple progression when relatively few data were available now appears to be much more complex and much less gradualistic. So Darwin’s problem has not been alleviated in the last 120 years and we still have a record which does show change but one that can hardly be looked upon as the most reasonable consequence of natural selection.” David M. Raup, “Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology,” Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin, Vol. 50, No. 1, January 1979, p. 25.

“Surely the lack of gradualism—the lack of intermediates—is a major problem.” Dr. David Raup, as taken from page 16 of an approved and verified transcript of a taped interview conducted by Luther D. Sunderland on 27 July 1979.

“In fact, the fossil record does not convincingly document a single transition from one species to another.” Stanley, p. 95.

“But fossil species remain unchanged throughout most of their history and the record fails to contain a single example of a significant transition.” David S. Woodruff, “Evolution: The Paleobiological View,” Science, Vol. 208, 16 May 1980, p. 716.

[From “In the Beginning” by Walt Brown]
Logged

Truth Frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.
oldmike
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 980


View Profile
« Reply #2031 on: 25 May 2017, 4:10:11 AM »

You keep on making the same mistake.

If the universe is 6000 odd years old, Then God must have placed these fossils 6000 odd years ago. If His motive was to confound scientists into thinking that the world is ancient, He would have planted a complete fossil record.
The fossil record is incomplete. Then either God is incompetent, or the earth is really old, and the fossil record is incomplete because we have yet to discover more fossils. The chance that a creature becomes a fossil when it dies is around 1 in a million.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 134 135 [136]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines